Jump to content
TUFLOW Forum

Search the Community

Showing results for tags '1d_nwke'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • About This Forum and Announcements
    • How to Use This Forum
    • Forum Feedback
    • Announcements
  • TUFLOW Modelling
    • 1D/2D Linking
    • 1D Domains
    • 2D/2D Linking
    • 2D/2D Nesting
    • 2D Domains
    • Boundaries
    • Documentation & Tutorial Model
    • Dongles/Licensing/Installation
    • Ideas / Suggestions / New Features
    • Mass Balance/Mass Error
    • MATH Errors & Simulation Failure
    • Restart Files
    • Post-Processing
    • Software/Hardware Requirements
    • Text Files (.tcf, .tgc, .tbc, .ecf)
    • Utilities
    • Miscellaneous
  • Other Software
    • ISIS-TUFLOW
    • MapInfo/Vertical Mapper
    • miTools
    • Other GIS/CAD
    • SMS
    • XP-SWMM2D
    • UltraEdit/Excel
    • TUFLOW Apps

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


AIM


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


Location


Interests

Found 2 results

  1. The manual states in Section 5.7.3.5 that: "The weir crest level and dimensions are specified within the additional attributes contained within a 1d_nwke layer...". This seems to imply that the absolute level of the weir crest can be specified as an attribute. In actuallity the weir crest is inferred by adding the EN2 attribute to the obvert of the B, R or W structure. The obvert itself is presumably inferred from the structure invert level plus the "Height_or_WF" attribute. If one reads the attribute description for EN2 it should be clear what is intended, however, I have recieved a model where the modeller had misinterpreted this value to be an absolute level. Since you are currently updating the manual, perhaps the current text of section 5.7.3.5 could be changed to match Table 5-10.
  2. Hi All, I have a few pits in my pit/pipe network that are showing zero flow into the pit (according to the TS layer), however the CCA layer is showing the pipes are running full. I used the SA_PITS method to input the flow directly into the pits. Has anyone else seen this before?
×
×
  • Create New...