Jump to content
TUFLOW Forum

Search the Community

Showing results for tags '2d_lfcsh_uvpt_check'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • About This Forum and Announcements
    • How to Use This Forum
    • Forum Feedback
    • Announcements
  • TUFLOW Modelling
    • 1D/2D Linking
    • 1D Domains
    • 2D/2D Linking
    • 2D/2D Nesting
    • 2D Domains
    • Boundaries
    • Documentation & Tutorial Model
    • Dongles/Licensing/Installation
    • Ideas / Suggestions / New Features
    • Mass Balance/Mass Error
    • MATH Errors & Simulation Failure
    • Restart Files
    • Post-Processing
    • Software/Hardware Requirements
    • Text Files (.tcf, .tgc, .tbc, .ecf)
    • Utilities
    • Miscellaneous
  • Other Software
    • ISIS-TUFLOW
    • MapInfo/Vertical Mapper
    • miTools
    • Other GIS/CAD
    • SMS
    • XP-SWMM2D
    • UltraEdit/Excel
    • TUFLOW Apps

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


AIM


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


Location


Interests

Found 1 result

  1. Hi There, I am trying to include a 2d_lfcsh in my model to represent a bridge. The bridge is represented as a wide line with a width in the direction of flow of 22m. The bridge has only 2 piers with a fairly wide unrestricted flow area. As such I am including no blockage, but have calculated (using the Bradley HoBW 1998 method) a FLC of 0.025. When I open the 2d_lfcsh_uvpt_check files a value of 0 is showing for the FLC across the whole bridge. I have another bridge in the model, which I have modelled as a polygon, which seems to be working ok from the check files. I can't figure out why I am getting 0 in the check files for the first bridge. Could it be an issue of rounding or significant figures? Or is there something deeper going on that I need to resolve? Would love any suggestions here. Thanks, Melodea.
×
×
  • Create New...