TUFLOW Forum

# Grid Sizes

## Recommended Posts

Im working with a 5m grid and would like to have an area of it reduced to a finer grid, at the same orientation and within the same extent. Is there a simple way of doing this?

##### Share on other sites

Not an amazingly simple way, no, not yet. Sometime soon I hope! But the old multi-domain with the 2d-2d boundaries aren't too difficult to set-up, and work fine in most cases.

##### Share on other sites

Slightly off the original topic, but does anyone know whether there are any limitations on grid size choices for 2D2D linking? E.g. do they have to be multiples of each other (so 2m and 5m)? Is it better if one is half of the other as a minimum ratio (e.g. 5m and 10m)?

I've got a FloMo-Tuflow model where only a small section of it is an area of interest and i'm considering running a 4m grid in domain of interest, with a 20m grid in domain of less interest. The area of less interest is very big and we need to include it due to hydrology calculations (on a budget) but need to minimise run times.

Other combinations could be:

- 4m:24m

- 8m:24m

Thanks

##### Share on other sites

In large part that's going to depend upon your topography/water surface at the location you'd like to join these different resolutions... Here's why:

• The link happens by using hidden 1D nodes that are connected to each 2D domain using HX boundaries
• This means that the water surface can only 'bend' along the boundaries every time there is a hidden node
• It's worth noting at this point that the user has control over the spacing of the hidden nodes!
• As with other 1D elements connected to a 2D domain via HX then, it is important to have both
1. Enough nodes to capture and curve in the water surface
2. Not too many nodes so they're always at least 3 or four cells apart.

I think for my own purposes, I've not wished to reduce by more than a factor of 5 when refining, but the nature of the link means there's neither requirement nor benefit in having multiples or factors of 2 between your 2D cell sizes. With a good location for sitting your boundary, any of the combinations you suggest would be fine.

I hope that makes sense and helps! Do feel free to ask further clarifying questions if needs be.

PHA.

PS. To the devs, any progress on the original question in this thread? The whole nested 2d with quad-tree (or nine ways) refinement of cells thing that was discussed so many moons ago?

## Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×

×